Review of 2014

So here we are, just a few days away from the end of the year so I thought I would take a look back at the films that were on offer in 2014.

Here is a list of the movies I was lucky/unfortunate (delete at applicable) enough to catch at the cinema:
(In no particular order)
Frozen, Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit, The Book Thief, The Lego Movie, Muppets Most Wanted, Captain America: The Winter Soldier, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, The Raid 2, Godzilla, X-Men: Days of Future Past, Edge of Tomorrow, Chef, Mrs Brown's Boys D'Movie, Transformers: Age of Extinction, Guardians of the Galaxy, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies, Expendables 3, Lucy, The Equalizer, Fury, A Walk Among The Tombstones, Horns, Testament of Youth, Pride... (25)

Best Film of the Year - Guardians of the Galaxy
I took my pen and notebook to the cinema as usual but when I exited the screen I had written nothing. Why? Because I was mesmerised by everything on the screen and couldn't bare to take my eyes away in fear of missing a thing. It made me laugh, it made me cry and it looked amazing. I have since watched it again on Blu-Ray and my opinion was still the same.

Worst Film of the Year - Mrs Brown's Boys D'Movie
I didn't want to watch this film but it was the first review I had for the Thurrock Enquirer and there was no way I was going to give up the opportunity to get a piece in print. There were some funny bits but not enough to save it from being tired, messy and border-line racist (Mr Wang, really??).

Biggest Disappointment of the Year - Transformers: Age of Extinction
This film was saved by some impressive visuals and the long awaited inclusion of the Dinobots. The human cast were mostly unbelievable or totally crap. I believe this was the death knell for the franchise and it's time to leave Transformers alone, at least until they get some better actors (Mark Wahlberg was OK but did you really believe he was a loser inventor?).

Biggest Surprise of the Year - Chef
There were a couple of contenders for this category but I chose this film because of the way it made me feel when I left the cinema. This is a feel good movie; a comedy without being gross-out or overly sexual. A great cast including the much under-rated John Leguizamo and utterly gorgeous Sofia Vergara. There is also a fabulous cameo from Robert Downey Jr. I'm a bit disappointed that nobody bought it for me as a Christmas present... off to check the sales!

Spring was the best season for films (and for the blog)... the releases around this time seem to have replaced the 'Summer Blockbuster'.

And so to 2015. The most obvious big events will be Avengers; Age of Ultron and Star Wars: The Force Awakens, but lets not forget other big titles such as Jurassic World, Spectre, Ant-Man, Mission Impossible 5, The Hateful Eight, etc, etc, etc...

What are you looking forward to next year? And what have been your films for 2014? Let me know by visiting my Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/silverscreensnob1980) and share your thoughts.

Review: The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies (12A)

This is Peter Jackson's final time to display J.R.R Tolkien's Middle Earth in all its glory. Could he give The Hobbit the ending we all deserve?

The third instalment begins at the point where the second ended; Smaug has left the mountain to wreak death and destruction on Lake Town. The drab grey and blue screen is suddenly turned fiery red during his violent but short rampage.
The Smaug portion is dealt with quickly. At least we get to hear the smooth, dulcet tones of Benedict Cumberbatch one last time. Everything is solved within ten minutes which is disappointing but it does allow the film to concentrate on the five armies of the title.

If this film could have another subtitle then the first half would be 'The Madness of King Thorin'. Richard Armitage's dwarf king slowly descends into insanity while Bilbo and company can only look on. It is easy to turn on Thorin as he becomes power hungry and gold obsessed, but there are glimpses of the dwarf underneath in a couple of scenes he shares with Martin Freeman's Bilbo Baggins. It was touching to see the king smile when talking about the hobbit's plan to plant an acorn... simple but effective.

The second half presents the titular battle in all its glory. I won't say too much about it as I don't like spoilers but suffice to say that it looks amazing. Peter Jackson has had years of practice and does not let us down for the final part. The orcs, in particular, look incredible and the marching hordes are a spectacular sight.

There are so many strong characters; Lee Pace as Thranduil who veers from a figure of hate to a sympathetic father. Legolas, played by Orlando Bloom, who gets the best acrobatic moments as he did in The Lord of the Rings films.  Tauriel has made me feel much more positive about Evangeline Lilly's upcoming Marvel role as she displays both action role capabilities and a powerful emotional presence. Luke Evans has faltered as a solo leading man, but in the company of other capable actors he shines as Bard the Bow Man.  Christopher Lee and Ian McKellan prove that age does not stop the ability to kick butt as both wizards get involved in the fighting.

But it's the dwarves and their burglar, who are the stars. Armitage continues his wonderful portrayal of the dwarf king, from his descent into madness to his eventual redemption. His loyal followers are excellent, although it is a shame that we never really get to know them all. I admit to looking at the gathering of dwarves and not recognising a few faces.
Martin Freeman has cemented himself as a genuine star with his role as the hobbit of the title. His journey, from timid creature to one of courage and strength, has been one of the main reasons why I have much preferred these films over the original Peter Jackson trilogy. The only complaint I have is that, being the creature of the title, we do not see as much of Bilbo as we might expect. However, as readers of the book will already know, this is not Mr Baggins' part of the story, so his scaled down involvement is understandable. When he is on screen, Freeman plays him to perfection.

The film contains little nods towards what is to come with several references to The Lord of the Rings, some more obvious than others.

There has been criticism over the liberties that Jackson has taken with the source material; adding new characters and changing certain plot points. However, taken just as a film, it is entertaining and the 144 minute runtime, making this the shortest movie of the trilogy, flies past.

It feels quite sad to finally say goodbye to these characters and this world, but The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies is a fitting way to finish the series.

Blu-Ray Review: The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug

I have a dark secret that, after I've confessed it, may mean certain people do not look at me in quite the same way: I did not like the Lord of the Rings films. There, I said it. I watched all three but was never fully satisfied with them and therefore I confined the trilogy to a dark place where other films I have only ever seen once are placed, never to return.

So, surely, with the same director and the same author of source material, I would feel the same dissatisfaction with the Hobbit films. Well, no! I have enjoyed the first two instalments immensely and am actually quite excited about the third film, due out in December (I've already booked my tickets).

So what makes this trilogy more appealing than The Fellowship of the Ring, et al? The first thing that springs to mind is the hobbit himself. Martin Freeman is charming, even when he is sniffling in the face of danger. His journey from coward to hero is one that I have watched with great interest. I care what happens to him (yes, yes, I know everything turns out OK and he eventually 'grows' up to be Ian Holme but I can still worry). This is in stark contrast to my feelings towards Frodo and Sam in the first film trilogy. I don't know why but Freeman is just much more likeable.

The Dwarves of the film are also well cast. Richard Armitage is fantastic as Thorin OakenShield, a 'giant' among dwarves. Here is a character that could well have turned out to be a figure of hate, a sullen, rude dwarf who has little to no redeemable qualities. However the audience doesn't hate him, in fact they are fully behind the rightful king and this is in no small part down to Armitage's skill as an actor as well as Jackson's direction.

But enough of the trilogy, what about this particular part of the series? 

Some fans are upset with the changes that have been made to the original story; swapping goblins for Orcs, adding characters that didn't exist in the novel, etc. However, as a film, the changes make sense. Orcs are well established thanks to the Lord of the Rings, so the audience can already identify the enemy. This also applies to the extra parts of the film featuring Gandalf and the White Council. These vary enormously from Tolkien's text but it draws the audience in as they are familiar characters.

The original theatrical release was epic enough with a run time of 2 hours and 41 minutes but the Blu-ray has added and extended scenes meaning the film now clocks in at 3 hours long. Some of the included scenes include a whole plot line involving Thorin's father which was absent at the cinema.

It takes two thirds of the film before we meet the dragon of the title but he is more than worth the wait. Voiced and motion captured by the brilliant Benedict Cumberbatch, Smaug is a formidable enemy. His size and (literal) fire power is impressive but he is also clever, ruthless and charming in a scaly, human-hating kind of a way.

The supporting cast including Orlando Bloom's Legolas (the only role I've ever liked him in) and brand new character Tauriel (Lost's Evangeline Lilly) are all superb.

There are a few niggles which may seem minute considering the scale of the film. Things like, why is the most charming and romantic of the dwarves the least 'dwarf looking' (I'm talking about you Aidan Turner)? 

Why do we even need a romantic angle (Legolas/Tauriel/Kili)?

Why did they feel the need to change the character of Bard the Bowman? No offence to Luke Evans but he seems to be the weakest of such a big name cast. I just hope he can prove me wrong when he takes a more central role in the next part.

The Blu-Ray version is a tad too long and the new scenes do not add anything to what was already a great film. However, one of the bonuses of Blu-Ray is the pause function (handy for the much needed loo breaks).

And, without giving away the actual ending, prepared to be left with a cliffhanger than will have you wishing the time away until the release of The Battle of the Five Armies

Review: Fury (15)

World War Two has been covered throughout the years on both film and television. Various campaigns and battles have been displayed on screen for the education and entertainment of audiences. Could writer and director David Ayer give the viewer a different slant on such a well documented period of history? 

His latest film, Fury, follows an American tank crew during the final months of the conflict. Brad Pitt plays the commander, Don 'Wardaddy' Collier, a man for whom fighting has become the only way of life. When we first meet him, he violently beats a German soldier to death then releases the man's horse, free of its restraints. He is a character of contrast; both calm and philosophical but also brutal and almost soulless. His men need him to be both as they face a dangerous and relentless enemy.

After having lost one of their own, the team are sent raw recruit Norman Ellison (played by Percy Jackson actor Logan Lerman) who has never seen any action. It is Ellison's journey from newbie to battle hardened soldier that the film focuses on; how does war affect a man? The film seems to ask the audience if it is inevitable that Norman will follow the example of his fellow crew as war consumes him. 

The rest of the cast are fair support, although Jon Bernthal's character is completely unlikable. Ayer has obviously written the part to demonstrate how war can warp a man and in that regard Bernthal plays it perfectly, but it is hard to care what happens to him as the film continues.

Ayer does not shy away from the graphic nature of conflict. Filth, blood and death are smeared all over the screen as wave after wave of explosions hit the audience right between the eyes. The quiet, reflective moments only serve to lull the viewer into a false sense of security before the action begins again.

There have been some negative comments that Fury does not fully reveal the harsh conditions that men endured both in the war and as part of a tank crew. However, the film is brutal and pulls no punches in the way it portrays the fighting and hatred on both sides. There are some great performances from Lerman and Pitt, who both convey their roles superbly, allowing the audience to really connect with their characters. 

The viewer is left under no illusion; war is hell. Fury needs to be seen as an example of great set pieces, brilliant acting and as a testament to the men who fought.

Marvel Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D (Episode 5) - Recap

2x05 - A Hen in the Wolfhouse
Spoilers, this recap follows the U.S broadcast.
.
.
.
.
.

It's just like Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D, no sooner have we established that Agent Simmons is working as a mole within Hydra than her cover is blown and it's time to get her out.

Thank goodness for Bobbie Morse aka Mockingbird. As head of security at Hydra she is one vicious bitch and you're already psyching yourself up for a Morse/May showdown. However, she is actually another undercover agent and kicks some serious butt. In an instant you go from hating her to cheering her on; well played Adrianne Palicki. And was it just me or did anyone else scream at the TV "I bet she's Hunter's ex". 

Skye's father's monstrous personality is starting to come into play, scaring even the ice cool Raina. I am starting to change my mind about Kyle MacLachlan's casting after his performance in this episode. He displayed a vast range of emotions during these 40 minutes. He must have found that damn fine cup of coffee I recommended a couple of weeks ago.

Talking of Raina, it looks like she'll be sticking around for a least a couple more episodes. She is so slick that I just can't see anyone taking her out... yet.

All in all another safe episode, Simmons is back, the team have a new recruit and Skye and Coulson made up. However the alliance between Skye's father and Dr Whitehall proves intriguing and I can't wait to see the fall out from it.

Review: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (12A)

OK, so I went into this film with both excitement and trepidation.

I was taking my daughter to see a film which was based on characters I had watched and loved when I was her age. Now, I know the original 1990 film was hardly an Oscar contender, but for a young child it was the right mix of action and humour. Would the new version be a load of crap? Mumblings from other reviewers had been less than positive and that worried me. However I wasn't going to be put off so it was away to the cinema with an eager 9 year old girl in tow.

The plot is simple; four teenage mutant ninja turtle brothers must face the evil Shredder in order to save New York. See, how uncomplicated is that? Of course there are other elements to the story but nothing overly convoluted which is good seeing as the film's 101 minute run time is already crammed with action sequences and plot devices. The scenes speed into one another; We meet Eric Sacks (William Fichtner) and establish his relationship with April, then in the very next minute, he is meeting with Shredder and discussing their evil plans. Nothing is given a chance to build up, questions are answered as soon as they're asked.

There are also unnecessary links between the characters. Without giving away too many spoilers, the writers (Josh Appelbaun, Andre Nemec and Evan Daugherty) have tried too hard to establish a shared history. While I can understand why they have attempted to do so, it does not add anything and should have just been left alone.
The main action sequences are stunning, especially the downhill chase that has featured heavily in the trailers. Jonathan Liebesman has directed effects laden movies before (Wrath of the Titans and Battle Los Angeles) but this is probably his best attempt so far.

The turtles do not have equal screen time, with Michelangelo and Raphael receiving most of the attention. Also, I was a little put off by the fact that Leonardo was voiced by Johnny Knoxville. His voice is too recognisable above all the others (even Tony Shalhoub who I thought did a good job as the voice of Splinter). Apart from that niggle, there is a great relationship between the turtles (and the rat). 

Megan Fox was not awful as April O'Neil, yet she wasn't that good either. She spent too much time being the object of various lustful comments, and not enough being the fearless reporter she is supposed to be (taking photos on a phone does not make you a journalist). And Will Arnett's character is next to useless; I'm hoping that they bring Casey Jones in to the sequel.

As a reviewer, I should probably abhor this film but as a movie lover, I walked out of the cinema having enjoyed it. Yes, the humour is immature but this is a children's film for adults. There are several references that will be certain to go over younger heads yet they can enjoy the fart jokes and physical comedy.

So, was my trepidation justified? A little. But the child inside me couldn't help but love it and I am actually looking forward to a second helping.

TV Review: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D (Season 2 - Episode 3)

SPOILERS - this review/recap is based on the US broadcast

2x03 - Making Friends and Influencing People

This episode starts with the reappearance of Dr Whitehall (Reed Diamond) who is relishing the brainwashing of an ex S.H.I.E.L.D agent (slightly reminiscent of A Clockwork Orange).

We then to cut to our first view of the season of Simmons (the real one that is, not the one in Fitz's head). She wakes up in a well lit and beautifully decorated apartment, she exercises on her very own running machine, she peruses her wardrobe full of outfits... (you get the picture). Everything is sweetness and light (including the music) until we cut to the large Hydra emblem on the wall of her lab. Shock, horror, is Simmons now a Hydra agent?

This being Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D, everything is explained quickly and, panic over, Simmons is really undercover (phew, she's far too sweet to be a bad guy). It's never fully explained who's decision that really was but I'm sure that's for another time.

The bad guy for this week is Donnie Gill, who we last saw in the Season One episode 'Seeds'.He is shown but discarded all too quickly, I would have liked to see him for a couple more episodes to really explore his power.

But for me, it was Ward that was the real catalyst for this week's drama. Iain de Caestecker was on top form yet again when he finally came face to face with his would be killer. Ward also had a profound effect on Skye, especially when he informed her that her father was still alive. Her first kill barely raised her heart rate but this shocking revelation made her heart race. Does she believe the double agent and his new found honesty?

And by the way, that S.H.I.E.L.D agent from the beginning, she may figure in future episodes after her eventual corruption.

Review: A Walk Among The Tombstones (15)

This film was reviewed as part of the Festival Leisure Park Film club and was printed in the Thurrock Enquirer. Below is the link for the review which was printed unedited (I was quite chuffed about that).

http://www.theenquirer.co.uk/film-review-a-walk-among-the-tombstones/

Review: The Equalizer (15)

Director - Antoine Fuqua

Writer - Richard Denk

Starring - Denzel Washington, Chloe Grace Moretz, Marton Csokas

Runtime - 131 minutes


There are many people my age (a youthful 34 years) that may have heard of the television series The Equalizer but never watched an episode. It was an 80s show that starred Edward Woodward as a retired intelligence agent who helped people in trouble. Think the A-Team, but with more violence.

Fast forward to 2014 and Antoine Fuqua has once again teamed up with Denzel Washington, this time to produce a cinematic remake of the programme. 

We begin by meeting Washington's character, Robert McCall, who is far too meticulous for a simple assistant in a DIY store. But here he is, helping his co-workers and encouraging them to achieve their dreams. He blends in without truly being one of them as proved when he is quizzed by two younger colleagues about his past. The story then follows McCall to a 24 hour diner where he has a strange relationship with a young prostitute, played brilliantly by Chloe Grace Moretz. She has the right mix of innocence and world weariness; it's easy to forget that she once played a little girl who caused so much controversy with a certain C word.

This platonic relationship leads to some violent consequences when the young woman is severely beaten and our hero's true nature presents itself.

Without giving too much away, Robert's actions lead to a 'fixer' being sent from Russia to deal with this problem. Marton Csokas is adept at playing Russian scumbags on film and TV, all be it this time in an expensive suit. He is a worthy adversary for McCall and the face off between the two is captivating.

The final sequence takes place in the DIY store and features one of the most tense hand to hand fight scenes in recent history. There are some brutal kills that made several members of the audience audibly gasp. Shopping in B&Q may never be the same again.

I have read some reviews that complain about the lack of history of our hero. To that I say those people obviously feel the need to be spoon-fed information as they are too lazy to watch the film. Antoine Fuqua is a show, not tell, director. All the facts are lovingly displayed on the screen. The drama may not be as intense as Fuqua and Washington's first collaboration, Training Day, but it's still a thoroughly entertaining piece of cinema with great set pieces.

And, if nothing else, The Equalizer goes to prove that there is nobody who looks better than Washington when walking away from an explosion in slow motion.

TV Review: Sons of Anarchy (Season 7 - Episode 4)

7x04 - Poor Little Lambs

SPOILERS - for anyone who has not watched the episode.

The revenge trail is still hot as Jax continues to stalk Lin's businesses in a bid to destroy him. However the tables have turned as the Chinese deliver a brutal retaliation; looks like someone has snitched on the Sons (hands up if you think it's Jury). Guns and grenades figure into the violent and bloody come back. However Mr President didn't look too upset, he just looked even more angry. The eventual showdown between these two leaders is going to be intense.

With all this fighting Sutter drops in some emotion with the welcome return of Venus Van Damme (Walton Goggins with a much more modest neckline). The club need Venus' help in locating a pastor's wife in order to keep August Marks sweet (and that was the least interesting part of the episode). We find out that Tig has kept in touch with the delectable Miss Van Damme and we are treated to some tender moments between the pair. Massive kudos to Kim Coates and Walton Goggins; their exchanges are balanced perfectly. They were sweet without tipping over into utter absurdity.

Courtney Love makes her first appearance as Abel's teacher. I wonder if she relished the irony when she says, "Grandma's kind of crazy", something I'm sure she's heard a little bit in her own personal life (the crazy part, not Grandma, obviously).

Talking of Gemma, she's about to drive Juice out of town once and for all. But both murderers seem to have the same idea when they ready their guns with silencers. Are they protecting themselves or is the survival instinct finally kicking in? Is a face off between the two now imminent? Katey Sagal has always been amazing but Theo Rossi's acting is certainly up there with the best.

There is a part of me that now wants to move this Triad/Mayan/Niner/Marks (bet the Irish are glad they're out of it this season) bit on... it's all about the eventual truth and the retribution that will be wrecked on the real culprits.

TV Review: Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D (Season 2 - Episode 2)

SPOILERS - do not read if you're not following the US broadcasts of the show.

2x02 - Heavy is the Head
 
No time for a breather, we join the action just as it ended last week, with Creel escaping with the 084 and Hunter being trapped in the SUV as the only survivor of last week's crash (I honestly did not see that coming; of the three newbies I did not think the English guy would be the only one to make it to episode two, let alone be a major part).

Fitz's mental problems are still heartbreaking to watch (bravo Mr De Caestecker) but we already have a small sign that the old Fitz is somewhere about inside that damaged brain. Like everything else in the Marvel universe, time waits for no man (or woman). His relationship with Mack is lovely to watch; even his inner Simmons approves, yet I wonder how this friendship will proceed considering his previous bromance ended in his near death.

It was nice to see Reina ('Flowers') back and no longer working for Hydra. However she seems to have aligned herself with somebody supposedly much scarier, Skye's father. I was a little disappointed when we finally met Kyle MacLachlan (and I wish the show had not put his name in the beginning credits so it had been a bit more of a surprise). The shot of the bloody hands at the end of Season One seemed to promise so much (yes, the hands were that scary) but I found it hard to take MacLachlan seriously as a monster. Maybe he just needs a damn fine cup of coffee and everything will be OK (that's one for the Lynch fans).

As per usual, Coulson had all the best lines delivered in his normal dead pan style.Watching him and Talbot face off was entertaining.

No Reed Diamond this week but by the looks of the trailer for next week we'll get to see him again, as well as a surprise that may not be so pleasant for the team... keep watching folks.

Arts in Thurrock (or, Why We Need The Thameside Theatre)

Yesterday I had the pleasure of attending the awards ceremony for the third annual Thurrock Film Festival. There were 72 shortlisted films, from many different countries, with several nominations in each of the competition categories.

As I sat in the Thameside Theatre, with many of the nominated film makers and their families, I couldn't help but smile at the enthusiasm of everyone attending. It made me wish I had fulfilled the directing ambitions I had as a youngster, but there's no use crying over misplaced youth (I'm pretty happy just watching and writing about movies).

Then it made me think, if we didn't have a local theatre, what would become of some of the groups that use it regularly? It's served the film festival well for the last three years and is home to many amateur dramatic groups. With the Thameside's future in jeopardy, what will happen to this section of the arts in Thurrock?

There are other places within the area that serve the arts; the High House Production Park playing an important part in the creative industry. However the Thameside has the history as well as housing our local museum and the largest library in the borough.

I admit to being lazy in my support of the theatre, only attending film related events and the pantomime. However, having visited the place every day this weekend, it's a lovely venue with so much to offer the local people. Where else would you get a room full of grown ups dressed up as T-Birds and Pink Ladies, singing at the top of their voices with absolute strangers? Where else can I go to watch productions of musicals, dramas and Shakespearean tragedies for the fraction of West End prices? I now plan to show my support and frequent a lot more shows.

The Thurrock Film Festival has renewed my faith in fans of film, whether they be the creative brains or the willing recipients of the work. I pray the festival continues for another year but will our local theatre still around to play host?

Thurrock Film Festival 2014 - Winners

The Thurrock Film Festival 2014 ended this evening with its award ceremony. With 72 shortlisted films and several nominated in each category, this has been a successful third year for organisers Natalie and Ben Scarsbrook.

Here are this year's winners:

Best Animated Film - Villains (Dir: Alex Crowley)

Best Student Film - Glyn (Dir: Yann Gorriz)

Best Fiction - The Three of Us (Dir: James Fox)

Best Documentary - The Drive (Dir: Declan Robert George Cox)

Best Music Video - Duress (Dir: Connor Warren)

Under 18 Category - Harsh Blue (Dir: Toby Elwes)

Best International Film - The Future (Dir: Venetia Taylor)

Best Editing - Frederic Fournier (The Three of Us)

Best Performance - Sally Mortemore (A Cake for Mabel)

Best Direction - Jane McGee (A Cake for Mabel)

Audience Choice - The Last Day (Dir: Oli Game

Best in Festival - The Three of Us (Dir: James Fox)

Retro Review: Psycho

The opening night of the Thurrock Film Festival presented a screening of the Hitchcock classic, Psycho. I haven't seen this film for years so, for myself, this was a real treat.

Spoiler - Although it's one of Hollywood's most famous scenes, stop reading if you have never seen the film and go watch it immediately.

The film is a tale of two halves with that scene as the dividing wall. 

We begin the tale with Marion Crane (Janet Leigh) sprawled over her lover in a hotel room wearing next to nothing. All she wants is to be with her boyfriend, Sam, but he is in debt and doesn't want to drag her into his problems. We then follow Marion back to her job where her boss asks her to deposit $40,000 into the bank. It doesn't take a genius to figure out what happens next and the beautiful Miss Crane is soon driving out of town with the money in her bag. So far it's all very crime drama with a touch of noir.

She eventually ends up at the Bates Motel and we meet Norman (Anthony Perkins). He is handsome and polite, if not socially awkward. It is here that Marion meets her doom in that shower. The iconic scene is not overly gruesome but it's powerful and stays with you after the film has finished.

The second half of the film follows Marion's sister (Vera Miles) and Sam as they try to discover what happened to her. Here the horror elements come to the foreground.

Hitchcock was a master of his trade; Psycho truly showcases his eye for film. Some of the shots convey horror, paranoia and suspense, especially in the scene with the private detective (Martin Balsam) in the Bates' house. His use of shadow and close-ups create a film that conveys a sense of dread that modern directors should take note of.

I'm not a fan of horror but Hitchcock is always an exception. His work is visually wonderful and his stories are captivating. A classic that all film makers and film fans should watch.

TV Review - Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D (Season 2 - Episode 1)

Season 2 - Episode 1, Shadows

We kick start the new season by travelling back to pre S.H.I.E.L.D 1945. In one of the biggest geek out moments of TV history, we got to see Peggy Carter AND the Howling Commandos take down a Hydra operation led by Reed Diamond's high ranking officer.

Back in the present and what is left of S.H.I.E.L.D are still in The Playground, still in hiding but still trying to save the day. They are joined by 4 mercenaries led by Isabelle Hartley (Lucy Lawless).

This episode sees the team go after an 084 but not just any 084, the first 084. It's dangerous but exactly what it does is still a mystery.

All the Ward fans rejoice, the traitor is being held in the basement of The Playground complete with bad guy beard. The exchange between him and Skye was razor-sharp, hopefully there will be many more of these to come.

Coulson still has the best comedic moments (and the best speeches) but this season opener is much more action packed than the premiere of the first season; the show has hit the ground running and I hope they don't run out of steam.

The biggest story has to be Fitz's and how he has coped since almost drowning at the end of season one. I won't give anything away but Ian De Caestecker was definitely the best actor of the episode.

TV Review - Sons of Anarchy (Season 7 - Episode 3)

Season 7x3 - Playing with Monsters

Jax's plan, which was only revealed in the last episode, is now in full swing; his hate for Henry Lin knows no bounds. However, a meeting with August Marks at the top of the episode serves to put more hurdles in the way of the club's revenge, not that Jax cares. The vengeful president is now trying to buy the loyalty of the One-Niners gang in their bid to destroy the Triads and hide everything from August... can you say overly complicated?

Like a deadly spider, Jax is spinning a web of lies and deceit. It's hard to keep track of who he is being honest with and who will end the episode with a hole in their head courtesy of the Sons. Charlie Hunnam plays the part so well, it's hard to tell which way the scene will go.

The club finally meet the town's new sheriff. I still don't know what to make of Annabeth Gish in the role but I have a feeling that's Sutter's plan.

The meeting between Chibs and Juice was wrought with emotion. Both actors are superb without going overboard. No long speeches and no large gestures but everything is done with just a few looks. There is no going back for Juice whilst Chibs still has love for his brother despite what he said. It was heartrending when Chibs revealed his true feelings by admitting that Juice needed to leave town; there was no need for further words.

Jimmy Smits is, by far, still my favourite character and it's sad to see his further descent into the gang life. He is too nice to kill off so please Mr. Sutter, let him have a (semi) happy ending.

Facebook Page: Silverscreen Snob

https://www.facebook.com/silverscreensnob1980

This is the address of my Facebook page which I update daily with news and trailers. Latest news about the 'Deadpool' film and what is happening with action sequel 'London Has Fallen'.

Take and look and give it a like.

TV Review: Sons of Anarchy (Season 7 - Episode 2)

Season 7, Episode 2 - Toil and Till

SPOILERS for anyone not following the American broadcast of the show.

After last week's bloody opener we now get THE plan to destroy Lin. Thanks to Gemma, Jax is convinced that the Chinese were behind Tara's murder and he is determined to exact revenge. The club, and the viewer, gets the full lowdown on what Mr Teller plans to do; it's thorough and brutal. The rest of the episode is pretty much a cacophony of gunfire. The end is a glimpse into even bigger problems for Jax and co; is internal conflict about to derail the club's plans?

Meanwhile, Juice is given money, a burner phone and a place to hide but unexplicably still remains in Charming. Theo Rossi is really coming into his own even if it is inevitable that he won't last the season (however, I thought Torric would be in it for the long run and remember how he went out).

It's not all doom and gloom; we are given two quality double acts. First, Rat Boy proves he is almost as vulgar as Tig as the two spend time on stakeout duty. We also get to watch the dynamic between Wendy and Nero. There's a definite spark but I imagine it will lead only to respect and nothing further; Wendy dare not risk Gemma's wrath.

We are finally introduced to the town's new sheriff played by Annabeth Gish. Her role in the final season is still yet to be determined but as she herself points out, look what happened to the last person who had her job.

This season is bound to be shrouded in violence and chaos, I believe things are going to get much, much worse.

New Radio Show: Mid-Week Film Review

I have been volunteering at Basildon Hospital Radio for 2 months now and I have just been given my own show.

The Mid-Week Film Review will be an hour and a half of reviews, recommendations, trivia and lots of music from films.

My first show is tomorrow (Wednesday, 17th September), 8.30pm - 10pm. You can listen online by visiting www.bhr1287.net or by using the TuneIn app.

TV Review: Sons of Anarchy (Season 7 - Episode 1)

Season 7, Episode 1 - Black Widower

SPOILER ALERT for anyone who has not watched all of season 6.

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

 Sons of Anarchy is back for its seventh and final season and Kurt Sutter delivers another stunning, if not ultra bloody, opener.

The episode begins with a recap of the previous season including that murder scene. Then we move onto a brutal prison beat down to really welcome us back.

The usual players are all back and dealing with the aftermath of Tara's death. Without giving too much away, cracks are already beginning to show but it'll be a while before anything comes to light... that would be too easy. Instead we get two serious monologues; one from a broken Jax to his club and the other from Gemma seemingly trying to convince Juice, and probably herself, that she is the only one holding her son together... yes, she does appear to be justifying that fork to the head.

Revenge is the theme for this episode. Not only is Jax seeking his wife's murderer but there is also a sub plot involving the Grim Bastards and some randy pastors (you just know that isn't going away any time soon).

We catch a glimpse of Marilyn Manson's white supremacist leader but his cameo is short and understated. We'll have to wait and see just how deep his role goes.

The episode ends as it begins, with blood drenched violence but I won't say any more... you have to see it to believe it.

This season promises so much; it's hard to see how anyone deserves to make it out alive. I know I will certainly be on the edge of my seat each week wondering just who will survive each episode.

Also it was nice to see  Niko Nicotera (Rat Boy) and David Labrava (Happy) finally make it to the opening credit sequence.

Review: Pride

When you think of the miners' strike of the 1980s your first thoughts are probably not of Gay Pride, flamboyant disco and pink dildos. However these are just some of the elements you will find in Matthew Warchus' new British film, Pride.

It's the little known true story of a group of gay and lesbian activists that decide to support the miners and their families by raising funds for their cause. Their generosity is not fully embraced by the unions but a random phone call soon sets in motion a series of events that changed attitudes and lives.

The cast is a veritable who's who of British actors, with every role performed to perfection.
Dominic West, most recognisable from his role in American detective drama, The Wire, is a hoot as former actor Jonathan whose 80s perm and snake hips manage to win over a social club full of repressed women and overly macho miners.
However it's the lesser known members of the cast that are the true heart of the film. George MacKay plays Joe (one of the film's fictional characters), a young man thrust into the unknown as he explores his sexuality and finds out who he really is.

Then there is Ben Schnetzer as activist leader Mark, a strong willed young man who stands up for what he believes and everyone, including the audience, loves him for it.

The film doesn't pull any punches. Bigotry, family feuds and the AIDS epidemic are all dealt with. Tony Award winning director Warchus and writer Stephen Beresford have given us a film that is funny and emotional, yet never tips over the edge into being overly sentimental. The script is full of witty banter and hilarious one liners.

This is one of the best British films produced in recent years. It reminds us of the harsh times we have faced but it also delights. The final piece of the movie is truly uplifting and will guarantee a smile on even the most miserable of faces.

Review: Lucy

Director - Luc Besson

Starring - Scarlett Johansson, Morgan Freeman, Choi Min-Sik

Luc Besson has always had the ability to write fascinating female characters. From Nikita to Mathilda (Leon), he has a way of getting the most from his leading ladies. And now he has returned with his latest female led offering, Lucy.

Lucy is a simple tale with a complex script and stunning visuals.Scarlett Johansson plays the titular young lady who unwittingly becomes a drug mule for a shady and vicious Korean businessman (Oldboy's Choi Min-Sik). When she is beaten by thugs, the bag of drugs she is carrying inside her bursts and the substance leaks into her system resulting in her being able to access more than ten percent of her brain. As her physical and mental abilities increase she needs help in the form of Morgan Freeman's Professor Norman.

In my opinion the trailers have been mis-leading. I was expecting an action film with Scarlett Johansson using the arse kicking skills she utilised as Black Widow. However viewers hoping to witness Ms Johansson fight an army of Korean gangsters will be disappointed. This is pure science fiction. I'm not saying it's a bad film, it's just not the film that people may have been led to believe it was.

The cast is solid; Johansson is stunning as always as she continues to star in films that are quite different to her recent Marvel stint. She is convincing as a terrified young woman who starts to morph into an all knowing being.
Morgan Freeman is like your favourite grandad; he never disappoints. Here he puts in another comfortable performance as he serves as a narrator for the film's more complex points.

The film promises so much but it never quite fulfils its potential.The plot is interesting enough even if the whole idea of only using ten percent of our brain has already been debunked as a myth. For the less science minded among us, it won't ruin the enjoyment of the movie.

Without giving away the ending, I walked away from the cinema feeling a little deflated. Sure, the film was entertaining and with a run time of 89 minutes, it didn't outstay its welcome. However, as the credits rolled there felt like something was still missing.

Lucy is one of those films that will have people talking in the pubs and restaurants well after it has ended. If that is a big plus when choosing a film then this is definitely for you. On the other hand, if you are more of a 'wham, bam, thank you mam' type of viewer, you may want to avoid (but make sure you give it a go on Blu-ray/DVD/Netflix/etc...).

Review: The Expendables 3

The Expendables was released back in 2010 and was a throwback to the action films of the '80s and '90s. It was the brainchild of one of the most famous action stars of that period, Sylvester Stallone.
It was back to the old school and audiences loved it.

Fast forward to 2014 and the third instalment of the franchise. If The Expendables 3 teaches us anything it's that bigger is not necessarily better. Including (many) new cast members and ramping up the set pieces to ridiculous may not add anything to the series but it's still an enjoyable action film.

The plot is simple; Barney (Stallone) and the boys are still pulling off missions, Stonebanks (Mel Gibson) then shows up, bad things happen and revenge is sworn. Sound familiar? Why over complicate a movie with something like a storyline when there are things to blow up. And blow up they do!

The action pieces are more spread out (this film is the longest of the three) but once they arrive they are shamelessly over the top yet entertaining.

The vast number of actors means that there isn't a chance to see the best of everyone. Indeed a couple of the roles are little more than cameos.
Of the new characters, only a few get their chance to shine. Wesley Snipes and Antonio Banderas are by far the best additions, especially Banderas' Galgo. However neither of these two are 'fresh meat'. 

The new breed include Twilight's Kellan Lutz (looking better here than he did as Hercules) and UFC World Champion, Ronda Rousey. I admit that I was personally looking forward to seeing the Rowdy One on the big screen and I wasn't disappointed. OK, she can't really act but she is given the opportunity to showcase her arse kicking skills, including her trademark armbar, and looks great doing it. The others don't do much which is a shame considering how much the trailers seemed to emphasise the 'old versus new' part of the film.

The 12A rating has meant that the film can access a wider audience but that does mean no more severed limbs and exaggerated arterial spray. A wire that would normally decapitate the villains now only knock them down. The old school, outrageous blood splatter of the original has disappeared which may disappoint a few people.

There are several little nods to some of the actors more famous films as well as Snipes referring to his legal problems; some of the in jokes might go over the heads of the younger viewers.

The Expendables 3 was never going to set the world alight but what it does do is deliver a 126 minute distraction from the world. If you don't set your expectations too high then you'll be pleasantly surprised.

R.I.P Robin Williams

I heard today about the death of Robin Williams and I cried.
He wasn't a friend of mine or of my family, I never met the guy. But his death killed a part of me inside.

I remember watching Mork and Mindy with my dad every week when I was younger. I thought Mork was the funniest and sweetest character on TV. Then my dad introduced me to Good Morning Vietnam and I was hooked. Williams was manic and made me crack up with laughter one moment, then made me weep with emotion the next.

I've never really cried over the death of a celebrity before, and there have been many, but this has really got to me. So I will be emotional and I won't care because Robin Williams meant a lot to me.

R.I.P Robin Williams... I hope you have peace now! xx

Website

www.silverscreensnob.co.uk

All film reviews can be found at my website as well as articles and trailers.

Currently working on an article about the Rocky films... be sure to keep checking the site for new bits and pieces!

Blu-ray Review: Doomsday

Director – Neil Marshall

Starring – Rhona Mitra, Adrian Lester, Bob Hoskins

With Scottish independence and the Ebola virus being two of the biggest stories in the news today, Doomsday could be seen as a very contemporary film despite being 6 years old. At the same time, it's also a throwback to the action movies of the late 1970s and early 1980s with George Miller and John Carpenter heavily influencing the look of the picture.

The film opens with a typical monologue over images of people dying of some unknown disease which is just an excuse to illustrate some of the gruesome visuals that will become a signature of the movie. Blood and guts splatter all over the screen; this film is not for the squeamish.

Doomsday wears its influences on its gore soaked sleeve. Think of it as Escape from Scotland where Snake Plisskin is now a woman with a robotic eye instead of a patch. It's nice to have a female led action film and Rhona Mitra plays a convincing heroine.

Mitra's Eden Sinclair has to lead a small military group into the quarantine zone (a.k.a Scotland) to find a cure for the deadly virus which suddenly appears in London. The squad includes Sean Pertwee's scientist and Adrian Lester's sergeant (yes, the roles are in the correct order).

As soon as the action crosses over the border we move into Mad Max territory. Tribe leader Sol is a maniacal rock god figure who is a replica of Mad Max 2 character Wez. Craig Conway, a virtual unknown, plays Sol in a way that makes him mad, bad but charming in a demented way.

After a while the film moves from post apocalyptic punk to medieval kingdom but it's not as implausible as you might think. And throughout all the scene changes, the John Carpenter effect remains; even the synthesised beats of the soundtrack evokes memories of the classic Escape from New York music.

Neil Marshall has a flair for writing and directing dark films, both in story and picture, and this is certainly a great example of his style. It poses some interesting questions about the direction of his upcoming King Kong feature.

Doomsday is far fetched for sure, there was never a danger that this might bother the Oscar committee. It is, however, an enjoyable 113 minutes (for the uncut version). Just make sure you let your food go down first or have a very strong stomach.

Review: Guardians of the Galaxy

Over the years there have been many 'space' films that have left an immense impression on the audience. 2001: A Space Odyssey, Alien (and it's sequels), Avatar and of course, the legend that is the Star Wars saga. Now Marvel has thrown its hat (or should that be space helmet) into the ring with the release of Guardians of the Galaxy. Could the tale of five misfits saving the universe be any good? In short, hell yeah!

The director, James Gunn, and the many Marvel producers have assembled a cast that is simply close to perfect. They work well together even when they are trying to kill each other. Chris Pratt has made the important step from idiotic supporting roles to bona fide leading man, and lead he does. It's hard to imagine anyone else taking on the part of Peter Quill; hell, he IS Peter Quill. The character is Captain Kirk, Han Solo and John Crichton all rolled up in one sarcastic, heroic package.

The rest of the cast are also as wonderful. Saldana's Gamora is as beautiful as she is deadly; Batista (billed as Dave Bautista) proves some wrestlers can act, as the vengeful Drax, Vin Diesel makes 3 words mean so much as walking tree, Groot, and last, but definitely not least, Bradley Cooper as the voice of bounty hunter Rocket Raccoon (who, along with Pratt, had some of the best lines of the movie). I could go on and on about how good each actor is, and each one is fantastic in their respective roles, but it's together that they excel.

The villains are also well cast if not slightly under used. The face off between Gamora and Nebula (Karen Gillan) teased in the trailer was a little bit of a let down. Lee Pace plays central bad guy Ronan the Accuser but most fans will be salivating at the prospect of seeing Thanos, brought to life by an unrecognisable Josh Brolin. Ronan is evil, but we all know in which direction this film, and it's already announced sequel, is heading.

The film is visually stunning. I made no notes at all during the film as I couldn't tear my eyes away from the screen for fear of missing a second. The script, written by Gunn and Nicole Perlman, is funny and snappy. Rocket and Quill may have had the best lines but the cast were each given their moments.

I must also make special mention of the soundtrack. There are some awesome songs from the 1970s and 80s that sound great but also add to the story.

The film is amazing, I cannot recommend it enough. It makes me excited for the sequel as well as for the future of the Marvel franchise.

As usual stay until the end of the credits, although younger viewers may not quite get the last scene.

DVD Review: The Artist

Director - Michel Hazanavicius

Starring - Jean Dujardin, Berenice Bejo, John Goodman, James Cromwell

It has taken far too long for me to get around to watching this Best Picture Oscar winner from 2012, but better late than never.

The story is straight forward; it follows the careers of silent movie star, George Valentin (Jean Dujardin) and new starlet, Peppy Miller (Berenice Bejo), as the 'talkies' are introduced in Hollywood(land) during the late 1920s. The simple story has a run time of only 100 minutes making it a sweet, uncomplicated film which never feels like it has overstayed its welcome.

The two stars are perfectly cast. Dujardin has the look of Clark Gable and the goofy charm of Cary Grant. He manages to convincingly convey sorrow, joy and a decent into madness without a word (he thoroughly deserved his Best Actor Oscar).

Bejo lives up to her character's name as she is vivacious and delightful to watch throughout.

Another mention must go to Uggie the dog who is almost as big a star of this film as the human actors. The hard of heart may look at his involvement in the storyline as cheesy but as Britain's Got Talent has proved, the public love a dog act.

From the opening seconds, the look and feel is of an authentic 1920s silent film. It's beautifully shot which more than makes up for the lack of speech. However I must admit that seeing big names such as James Cromwell, Malcolm McDowell and the wonderful John Goodman, without hearing their voices was slightly strange.

On a personal note, it was a wonder, but also a little sad, to watch how cinema used to be with audiences laughing, gasping and cheering. There wasn't a mobile phone or nacho in sight. A time when everyone went to the cinema purely for the film (maybe I was born decades too late).

I would recommend this film to everyone but I am under no illusion that they would all enjoy it. There are people who will just not appreciate a picture that does something a little bit differently. If you love film; not just the big blockbusters but film and cinema as a whole, then I urge you watch 'The Artist'.

Blu-ray Review: Dredd

 Judge Dredd has been around since 1977 when he was first introduced in the British magazine '2000 AD'. An attempt was made back in 1995 to introduce the character to the big screen but it bombed; even Sylvester Stallone couldn't save the film (despite coming off the back of the awful 'The Specialist', he had not long made 'Demolition Man' and 'Cliffhanger').

It has taken almost 20 years for anyone else to attempt a film starring the faceless man of the law. So, could it be done right or would it go the same way as the Stallone stinker?

From the very beginning we are warned that this is no comic book film for kids. Within the first 5 minutes we get several 'fucks' and a bloody graphic road accident... this is a movie purely for big boys and girls.

Karl Urban is suitably cast as the gravelly voiced titular hero. We don't get much background on the character but we don't really need it; character development is certainly not a requirement to enjoy this movie. Olivia Thirlby is Anderson, the rookie who must shadow Dredd, while Lena Headey plays Ma-Ma, a prostitute turned drug king-pin. The three principal actors fulfil their roles very well although there isn't too much to stretch their acting skills.

The film is mainly set within a high rise tower, full of the poorest folk mixed with criminal scum. For this reason there is the obvious comparison with 'The Raid'. Both films follow a similar, simple story; law enforcement enter a tall building to arrest a criminal only to become hunted by the inhabitants of said building. However, the vision and style of both films differ. Where 'The Raid' was all about the fights and smothered in grey hues, 'Dredd' is full of garish yellows and gun fire; there are barely any close quarter battles. It would be unfair to continue with any comparison, this film should be viewed on its own merit.

English director, Pete Travis, has produced a film that may be low on story development but is crammed with blood, guts and a visual style that impresses. The slow motion is used to superb effect, especially during the final act.

The film is good; not as good as 'The Raid' but, as I said before, the two really are different movies. It is worthy enough for a sequel but, two years later, we are still waiting for any news. Fingers are crossed that DVD and Blu-ray sales can encourage a second outing for Urban's Dredd.

Review: Transformers: Age of Extinction

 

It has been four years since we last saw Optimus Prime et al, and it's all change for the humans and Autobots.

A billboard referring to the attack in Chicago is one of the very few references to the original trilogy. There is no mention of Sam Witwicky and his adventures in the previous movies which, considering some of the plot points of the film, seems very unbelievable.

Instead we have a brand new human cast led by Mark Wahlberg as failed inventor Cade Yeager. Although playing a similar type of character to Shia LaBeouf, i.e., a lovable loser, Wahlberg is a much stronger and more charming lead. In fact the rest of the cast, although all new actors to the franchise, do not deviate from the Transformers mould. For example Stanley Tucci fills the void left by John Turturro's Agent Simmons by providing both an antagonist and comic relief. We also have the an evil, shadowy, suited, black ops cliché... I mean agent, in the shape of Kelsey Grammer (using his Sideshow Bob voice). There is also the usual young female, this time portrayed by Nicola Peltz, who does little more than cry, run and pose in tight shorts. Indeed, there are no strong, independent female characters which is just another theme that has been carried over from the previous three films.

But, let's face it, nobody watches these films for the human element; it's all about the enormous alien robots. The Autobots have also had an overhaul with only Bumblebee and Optimus Prime remaining from the original robotic cast. Of the rest, we have some not so familiar faces with some very familiar voices (including John Goodman and Ken Watanabe). And let's not forget the long awaited debut of the Dinobots, although you'll have to wait for two hours before they finally hit the screen.

The story is simple; the Autobots are now being hunted by humans and go into hiding. This is where Wahlberg's character comes into the mix as he finds, and later befriends, Optimus Prime. There is also the matter of an inter-galactic bounty hunter and the creation of man-made Transformers; somehow they all manage to connect up.

The run time of 165 minutes feels far too long yet there are some questions that are never really answered (where the hell is Sam being a big one). I can understand wanting to move on but would the Autobots really just forget about their greatest human ally?

With so many elements, this could easily have been made into two separate films, allowing for more character development. However, as the beginning of a new trilogy, there is the hope that everything will be explained better in the second and third films.

There is nothing complicated about a Michael Bay film; car chases, fights, explosions and some very childish humour. Transformers: Age of Extinction is no exception. The film is overly long and there was not enough in it to keep me enthralled for such a length of time. I'm afraid to say this was a case of style over substance where not even a giant, robotic dinosaur was enough to save the day.

Website update

www.silverscreensnob.co.uk has been updated (at last I hear you cry).

There is a review of Transformers: Age of Extinction, behind the scenes photos of Sacha Baron Cohen filiming 2 minutes from my workplace, plus my trailer of the week.

New Film Forum

Now the website is back up and running, I have added a forum to allow people to talk about films, stars, reviews, news, etc...
You can reach the forum by vising www.silverscreensnob.co.uk and clicking on the forum button found on the front page.

Back Online

So, after a few days disruption, www.silverscreensnob.co.uk is back online. I will get new trailers up later on today.

Last night I went to the cinema to review Mrs Brown's Boys D'Movie for my local newspaper. My review was limited to 200 words so I plan to write a more detailed piece and have it online by tomorrow at the latest.

So glad to be back :)

Half Year Review/Preview

So here we are, the mid-way point of 2014. It's been a pretty good year for film releases so far with many big names still to come. Here is my take on the films I have seen at the cinema during the first six months of this year.

JANUARY:

Frozen – This was actually released in December but I was a bit late to the party on this one and didn't take my daughter until the new year. For the first cinema trip of 2014, it was a great little movie. It reminded me a lot of the classic Disney films; the look and especially the songs. I love Idina Menzel and her voice is so well suited to the character of Elsa; her voice conveys so much power and emotion.

The one small thing I was disappointed with was the love story part of the plot. Yes, we know Anna is a lonely princess but does her companion have to be a man? Maybe I'm thinking about this way too much (which could be a first) but I was more interested in the sibling relationship and felt that the suitor part of it just got in the way. But then again, I don't suppose the film was aimed at 33 year old women with a heavy case of pessimism.

Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit – Another reboot of the Jack Ryan franchise. This time Chris Pine takes the role originally made famous by Harrison Ford. The film also stars Kenneth Branagh (pulling double duty as the main villain as well as being the director), Keira Knightley and Kevin Costner.

Much better than the previous attempt at a prequel, 'The Sum of All Fears', it's a good film without being anything special. The characters are all likeable enough, except Branagh who is suitably despicable as a Russian businessman/terrorist. It is worth a watch on Blu-ray/DVD but you might want to rent it first.

FEBRUARY:

The Book Thief – The story of a young girl living in Nazi Germany, coping with life through learning to read, is beautiful and sad in equal measure. The film is based on a book written by Markus Zusak which I still haven't gotten around to reading. Having never read the story meant I could appreciate what was happening on the screen without worrying about any changes between text and film.

This book mostly concentrates on the children which makes some of the events truly heartbreaking. The young lady who plays the main character of Liesel is superb but the best casting has to be of her best friend Rudy, played by Nico Liersch. His performance is second to none; I can't imagine any other child who could have been so convincing in the role.

MARCH:

Captain America: The Winter Soldier – The first Marvel film of the year and what a film it was. Of all the Avenger heroes, there could be an argument that Steve Rogers is by far the least exciting. However, this film proved that Captain America doesn't have to be exciting to be important. 'The Winter Soldier' was a game changer which I won't spoil in case people still haven't seen it (honestly, what have you been doing?) It has far reaching repercussions, not just for Avengers: Age of Ultron (out 2015), but the Marvel film universe as a whole. Plus the mid-credit sequence was 'squeeeeeeeee-tastic'.

APRIL:

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 – I'm not a massive fan of remakes or reboots but I love the new Spider-Man films. It's the new cast that do it for me. Andrew Garfield has the right balance of geek and cool (isn't the new word adorkable?) to carry off both Peter Parker and Spider-Man. Then there is Gwen Stacy, played by the gorgeous Emma Stone, who is much more charismatic love interest than the boring Mary Jane Watson. I look forward to the third film as well as the Sinister Six spin off.

The Raid 2 – The Raid was an awesome Indonesian film released back in 2011. The sequel took the original and stretched it out to cover the action, drama and gangster genres. The first was Die Hard on steroids; the second is The Departed with more blood and action. I highly recommend both films and hold on to the hope that the trilogy will be completed soon (rumours are that Tony Jaa will be in number 3, I hope that comes true!)

MAY:

Godzilla – I love Godzilla films; love, love, love them. It all stems back to my teenage years, when Channel 4 dedicated a whole weekend to the great lizard. I stayed up until the early hours of the morning transfixed by the King of Monsters and the band of Kaiju he faced over the years. I have already reviewed the film and expressed my disappointment over several elements of the new film but it hasn't dampened my enthusiasm for the franchise. I'm still excited for the sequel and I'm confident that there will be way more monster smack-downs in Gareth Edwards' second bite at the cherry.

X-Men: Days of Future Past – I had become disillusioned with the X-Men series after The Last Stand destroyed my enjoyment of the films. X-Men: First Class restored my faith in the mutants so I was intrigued by the thought of both old and new casts uniting for a new film. I was impressed and am actually looking forward to the new film due for release in 2016 (clue, watch X-Men: DoFP for a look at the next big bad).

Edge of Tomorrow – I don't understand the hate for Tom Cruise. He is entertaining in nearly every single film he stars in. This Sci-fi picture is 113 minutes of action and fun with Tom Cruise as a charming lead, ably assisted by Emily Blunt's 'Full Metal Bitch'. It won't win any Oscars but it is definitely worth checking out at home.

JUNE:

Chef – My most recent cinema trip was a delight. There are no explosions, no CGI overload. This film is all about the characters and the script both of which are more than satisfying. Using social media as a tool to create drama and as a salvation, this film is very much of the now. There are no massive stars; Favreau is better known for his directing than his starring roles while Sofia Vergara is recognizable for her work on TV's 'Modern Family'. But 'Chef' doesn't need big stars, it has a great story and it left me feeling all warm and fuzzy as the end credits rolled.

So, apart from a trip to see 'Mrs Brown's Boys D'Movie on Monday (to be reviewed for my local newspaper), that is the first half of 2014 done. However, that is not the end of my cinema trips. There are plenty of good movies still to come.

This list is not exhaustive and is in no particular order (not even release date):

Transformers: Age of Extinction - I don't care what people are saying about this film; have you seen the shots of Grimlock?

Guardians of the Galaxy - Been looking forward to this film since the first trailer. Plus I've had the other half rabbiting on in my ear about this for ages.

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles - I remember the cartoon and oh-so-cheesy original film. It looks like a lot of fun.

The Hobbit: The Battle of Five Armies - OK, so I wasn't entirely convinced by the name change but I am looking forward to see the last part of the book on the big screen. I will be sad to see the end; I have enjoyed this much more than the Lord of the Rings trilogy.

Hercules - Dwayne Johnson in full on beast mode. Kellan Lutz should be ashamed for even trying to compete.

Expendables 3 - Always entertaining with the added bonus that legitimate hard bitch Ronda Rousey co-stars as Luna... I hope there's an arm bar in the film somewhere.

Lucy - The trailer was intriguing and I do love films with Luc Besson's involvement.

Sin City: A Dame to Kill For - In Rodriguez I trust. The first was a clever noir with more stars than the galaxy. More stars, more storylines and more sex appeal than the original.

The Equalizer - Denzel Washington + Antoine Fuqua = Win!

Gone Girl - Based on the best selling novel of the same name. Ben Affleck has proved he is a good actor in films such as 'Argo'. Fans might be happy just knowing he isn't playing Batman in this one.

Fury - The trailer shows a much more dramatic film than first imagined. The cast looks good. No major stars apart from Brad Pitt but plenty of recognizable faces.

Nativity 3: Dude, Where's my Donkey - I love Christmas films and I'm not afraid to admit it.

Foxcatcher - My interest in this film probably comes more from Mark Ruffalo than Channing Tatum. Also the fact that it is a true story plus there is a slight connection with the world of MMA/UFC.

Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb - The first two films were entertaining and didn't make me want to stab Ben Stiller in the eye. I'm hoping to see more of Robin William's Roosevelt and maybe the three security guards, including the late Mickey Rooney.

Updated Website

So, thanks to my wonderful boyfriend, I have tinkered with my website so I can finally see who visits, what articles they read, etc...

The website is updated regularly with trailers, reviews and articles. It also has links to my Facebook and Twitter pages; all followers/likers welcome.

www.silverscreensnob.co.uk

See you there!

Die Hard - Which one is the best (and which is the worst)?

Over the past few weeks, we have introduced our daughter to the Die Hard films. She has loved them, she waits with anticipation to hear that immortal line (and proceeds to giggle furiously when it's uttered). It made me think about which film is the best but also why. So here is my opinion on the films, rated from worst to best; see if you agree.

5. A Good Day to Die Hard (Die Hard 5)

As a series, Die Hard has ended on a sour note. Each film tries to be bigger and badder than its predecessor so the fifth film was always going to have a hard time after McClane managed to save the entire country in Number 4. However moving the action to Russia just didn't work, it didn't feel right.

The bad guys were numerous yet, at the same time, non existent. Nobody cares about the villains and if you don't care about them, how can you care what John McClane does to stop them.

I missed the film at the cinema so that means I also missed the short reappearance of Lucy McClane... it's very bizarre to see her named fourth in the credits and not watch her on screen. And then we move on to the other McClane sibling. I have nothing against Jai Courtney but there were many times when I wanted to slap him around the face. He is supposed to be a CIA operative but spent a large part of the film having a hissy fit at seeing daddy dearest. Plus was there any need for him to talk to John about terrorism as if he were a complete novice... where has McClane Jr. supposedly been for the past few years (and 4 films)?

There are a few nice quips from John but the script is mostly lack lustre. The action sequences are cool and over the top (the car chase from the court being the stand out piece) but that can not save the film. Let's hope they do make another Die Hard film, if only to give the series a proper send off.

4. Die Hard: With a Vengeance (Die Hard 3)

A controversial choice maybe; many prefer the original three over the last two. However, I have my reasons.

As much as I love Samuel L. Jackson (and let's face it, who doesn't) I wasn't too sure about the introduction of his character. The first two films were all about McClane, as a lone hero, against a large number of terrorists. He had help along the way but he had never been saddled with a partner; There were already so many 'buddy' movies including Lethal Weapon, 48 Hours and even Beverly Hills Cop. Although I can see why they decided to change it up, the feel wasn't 'Die Hard'.

I was also a bit peeved that Simon (Jeremy Irons) just happened to be Hans Gruber's brother. Yeah, it made sense in the storyline, but it just felt lazy. Obviously that family had big problems. It also put an end to my theory that Hans was created from pure evil, but in a good suit.

I did enjoy seeing New York, even if most of it was at break neck speed. The city is a star in itself; from subways to parks, from rough to rich neighbourhoods. The Blu Ray transfer brings each scene to clear brilliance.

And on a last note, I finally know how they made 4 gallons with those jugs... only taken at least 10 viewings to fully understand it.

3. Live Free or Die Hard (Die Hard 4.0)

So, after pooping all over the buddy aspect of Die Hard 3, why on earth would I prefer number 4 and the introduction of computer hacker Matt Farrell? It's not as if Justin Long is a better actor than Samuel L. Jackson (hell no) but it's what the character brings that interests me. In the previous three films, John eventually figures out the villains dastardly plan and manages to save the day. In this one, John cannot work things out because he has no clue about the modern world and technology. He is firmly from the old school and this point is made throughout (sometimes like a hammer to the head). He needs Matt to save the day; heck, to save the entire country. Matt is like John's young, nerdy Yoda.

This is also the film when we are first re-introduced to John's kids in the form of Lucy Gennaro/McClane (Mary Elizabeth Winstead). Some people have described her character as a bitch but I suppose that's the whole point. She is her father's daughter and the audience gets to see her change as she realises she needs her dad a lot more than she first thought. It gives parents everywhere hope that our kids won't always hate us (you can tell I'm looking forward to the teenage years).

I confess that part of my preference for part 4 is the inclusion of Cyril Raffaelli and Maggie Q. Raffaelli is under-rated as a martial artist and I was excited that he was finally getting some Hollywood exposure (I thoroughly recommend watching District 13 and Kiss of the Dragon to see him at his finest). With Maggie, it was the addition of a butt kicking female that I enjoyed. She looks good but also fights like a beast; the clash between her and Willis is brutal.

This film just feels more exciting to me, and the ending is more satisfactory (although that part I cannot explain). We watched the DVD version because it was uncut so we sacrificed clarity of picture for more action (and that line in full).

2. Die Hard 2

So, onto sequel number one. From the opening shot of William Sadler performing naked Tai Chi to the final runway sequence, Die Hard 2 is almost as good as the original. The setting is bigger and the sequences more outrageous (maybe a little too outrageous but more about that later).


There are some nice little nods to the first film including appearances from Sgt. Al Powell and Richard Thornburg; just enough to prove it's a Die Hard film without looking like a carbon copy. The script, the look and action sequences all seem very 'Die Hard'.

The film is also a love letter between John and his wife Holly. Although they barely spend any screen time together, the film is about them; about John doing anything and everything to save his wife (again). Who isn't delighted at the end with their reunion?

There could be an argument that some of the action scenes are over the top. I'm not advocating that these types of films be realistic; we watch action films to be entertained, rarely to be educated. However, if people can moan about the runway scene in Fast & Furious 6 then surely we can't forget the one in Die Hard 2. Also the hand grenades used against McClane when the General finally escapes have the longest fuses known to man. But these are small niggles that, when you first watch, you don't care about.

The only reason this film doesn't get to number one is because it's a sequel, so...

1. Die Hard

In 1988, a film was released that started a series which, so far, has spanned over 25 years. It starred an actor in his early 30s who was better known for being one half of a TV duo in the series 'Moonlighting'. It was a film that forever linked Bruce Willis to action star status.

Many films have used the idea of confining the setting to one building (Towering Inferno in the 1970s, and more recently The Raid and Judge Dredd, being examples) but this one seems to be the most famous of them all.

It's not just Willis that makes this film so good. Alan Rickman has never been better than as Hans Gruber. In any other hands, this character could be just a typical slime-ball killer but Rickman manages to bring an air of class to the role. His coolness is only offset by his ruthlessness (the scene where he shoots Takagi is particularly callous).

John McClane is an everyman, nothing particularly extraordinary. A New York cop with family problems. That's what makes it so special. He's taking on the bad guys not because he has the training to do so, but because he is the only one who can.

The one liners are funny and the action is superb. Plus we first hear that infamous line.
There is a tenuous link between how the line comes about and a throwaway line made by a bad guy in Die Hard 5, bonus points if you know what it is.

Die Hard is my number one Christmas film; every Christmas Eve we watch Willis take on Hans, Karl etc...  Even after watching every year for at least the last 7 years, the film is neither tired nor boring.

And that's it, my view on the Die Hard film series. Not everyone will agree with me (thank God) but then again some people might not have thought about it before.
All I hope is that we get a sixth film to say farewell to McClane properly.